Understand the Analytics That Leaders Actually Use

In almost every leadership meeting, there comes a moment when a dashboard is pulled up and a sea of charts fills the screen. Lines trending upward, percentages in green, engagement counts climbing higher. At first glance, it looks impressive. Yet ask a simple follow-up question – “What should we do differently because of this?” and the room often falls quiet.

This is the heart of the problem with analytics in many organizations. The numbers look good, but they don’t guide decisions. Leaders are often presented with metrics that are designed more to reassure than to inform. The challenge is not generating data, most companies are swimming in it but transforming that data into something leaders can actually use.

The Trap of Vanity Metrics

A vanity metric is a number that looks important but doesn’t change how you act. Think of social media follower counts, website visits, app downloads, or email open rates. They can grow over time and suggest progress, but they rarely provide insight into business health or strategic direction.

Leaders sometimes gravitate toward these metrics because they are easy to track, easy to understand, and flattering when they move upward. But vanity metrics can give a false sense of security. A spike in website traffic may look exciting until you realize those visitors bounced within seconds. A surge in downloads might mean nothing if users never return after opening the app once.

The real issue with vanity metrics is not that they are inaccurate, but that they stop short of telling you what matters. They report on surface activity rather than deeper value. They can feed a narrative of growth while concealing churn, inefficiency, or missed opportunities.

Shifting Toward Meaningful Analytics

Leaders who rely on analytics that matter ask a different set of questions. Instead of “how many,” they ask “how valuable” and “what’s next.” They look for metrics that link directly to outcomes that matter for the business, whether that’s customer retention, revenue efficiency, or innovation velocity.

For example, a marketing leader might shift focus from total impressions to customer acquisition cost relative to lifetime value. A product leader might track activation rates—the percentage of new users who reach the point where they get real value from the product—rather than downloads. A sales leader might prioritize win rate per qualified lead instead of just total pipeline size.

These kinds of metrics are not always the easiest to measure. They require connecting different systems, aligning definitions across teams, and sometimes making judgment calls. But they are worth the effort because they highlight whether the business is actually healthy and growing in sustainable ways.

Without data, you’re just another person
with an opinion.

W. Edwards Deming

From Dashboards to Decision Engines

Another issue leaders face is that dashboards are often static. They present numbers in neat visualizations but don’t guide action. You see a trend line, but it doesn’t tell you why it’s happening or what to do about it.

The next stage of maturity is treating analytics not as a reporting exercise but as a decision engine. This means designing analytics systems that are built to support specific decisions leaders need to make.
If the decision is about where to allocate marketing spend, the analytics should compare channel performance not only by clicks but by cost per retained customer. If the decision is about expanding into a new region, the analytics should combine customer demand signals, operational costs, and local competitive pressures. If the decision is about product roadmap prioritization, analytics should surface which features correlate with retention and revenue, not just which are requested most often.

When analytics are structured around decisions, they shift from being passive background noise to becoming an active part of leadership conversations. Instead of being asked at the end of a meeting, “Can someone pull a report on that?” The analytics are built into the agenda itself.

Building a Culture That Values the Right Metrics

The transition from vanity metrics to decision-ready analytics is not just a technical upgrade. It requires cultural change. Leaders set the tone by the kinds of questions they ask. If an executive always praises rising follower counts, the team will optimize for that. If instead the executive asks, “How does this translate into retention or revenue?” the team will learn to dig deeper.
One of the most powerful practices leaders can adopt is to challenge every metric with a follow-up: “What decision does this inform?” If the answer is unclear, then the metric probably isn’t worth tracking at the leadership level.
Equally important is creating clarity around definitions. Terms like “active user” or “qualified lead” can mean different things to different teams. Without alignment, analytics become a breeding ground for confusion and mistrust. Leaders need to insist on shared definitions and ensure that everyone understands not just the number but how it’s calculated.

The Role of Storytelling in Analytics

Data without context rarely inspires action. Leaders who successfully use analytics also recognize the importance of framing insights as part of a narrative. A graph showing a downward trend in customer engagement is just a chart until someone connects it to customer feedback, market changes, or product gaps.
Good analytics storytelling does three things: it sets the context, highlights the insight, and points toward a decision. For example: “We’ve seen engagement dip by 12 percent in the past quarter. Customer surveys suggest confusion around our onboarding process. Unless we simplify onboarding, we risk higher churn. The data suggests we should prioritize that work in the next sprint.”

The point of analytics is not to impress with numbers but to persuade with evidence. Storytelling is what bridges the gap between information and action.

Scroll to Top